Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Milos Raonic vs Jarkko Nieminen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Raonic vs Nieminen analysis and find out who is favored!
Milos Raonic vs Jarkko Nieminen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Raonic 0 - 2 Nieminen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Raonic has won 60% of points on his second serve, while Nieminen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Raonic, in recent form, has won 46.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nieminen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.14% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Raonic has saved 70% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nieminen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Raonic has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 8/ 6), with Nieminen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Raonic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 244/ 112), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 70/ 45). Nieminen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 202/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 27/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Raonic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2), where as Nieminen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Raonic winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Raonic winning 1 and Nieminen winning 4. The last match between Raonic and Nieminen was at the Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters - Monte-Carlo, 17-04-2013, Second, Clay with Jarkko Nieminen getting the victory 6-3 1-6 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Raonic and Nieminen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Raonic winning 0 times and Nieminen 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Raonic winning 0, and Nieminen 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Raonic has played against opponents with an average rank of 75.14 while Nieminen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Raonic has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nieminen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Raonic has converted 23.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nieminen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Raonic 0 - 2 Nieminen
196
Rank
3
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
13
High
42
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
67% (472-236)
Career Total W/L
58% (574-409)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$15,006,639
Career Prize Money
$3,231,200
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Milos Raonic | Jarkko Nieminen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 24 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (90/149) | 73% (119/164) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (73/90) | 71% (85/119) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (30/59) | 62% (28/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (51/164) | 31% (46/149) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 1-6 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Milos Raonic
69%
(
67 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
43 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Milos Raonic
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Milos Raonic | Jarkko Nieminen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (54/46) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1.31 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 64 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 104.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (173/295) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 83% (143/173) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (70/122) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 21% (7/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (109/332) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Milos Raonic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Milos Raonic
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
76%
(
29 of
38)
3
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
9 of
38)
42
Total Points Won
41
|
7-6(4) 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Alexander Bublik
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
12
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Jesper De Jong
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
20
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
97%
(
36 of
37)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
37 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Milos Raonic
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
10
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(6) 6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Patrick Kaukovalta
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
18
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
97%
(
33 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
6%
(
3 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Milos Raonic
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
84)
7
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
8
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
32 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Milos Raonic
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
15
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jarkko Nieminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Frederik Nielsen
63%
(
88 of
139)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
63%
(
32 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
48 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Courtney John Lock
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
77
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Almagro
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
16
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Jurgen Zopp
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Anton Pavlov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Raonic Vs Nieminen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
